生物浮选剂对难浮煤的浮选效果评价

    Evaluation of flotation performance of biological reagents on difficult-to-float coal

    • 摘要: 为解决“双碳”政策下难浮煤高效分选与传统浮选药剂(煤油、石化柴油)安全环保性不足的问题,评估安全环保可降解生物浮选剂对特定难浮煤的适配性与分选效果,为难浮煤清洁分选提供技术支撑。以岚县正利矿选煤厂105#难浮煤为研究对象,首先通过小筛分试验分析煤样粒度组成,重点关注高灰细泥分布;采用浮选速度试验与分步释放浮选试验评定煤样可浮性等级,同步筛选适配工艺;借助反气相色谱法测定煤样色散表面能、酸碱表面能等表面能参数及亲水性指数,同时引入捕收指数对比生物捕收剂与煤油、十二烷、十六烷的捕收能力。随后采用“一次粗选+一次精选”两段浮选工艺,以精煤产率、灰分及尾矿灰分为核心指标,开展由生物捕收剂与生物起泡剂组成的生物浮选剂和现场药剂的对比试验,优化生物浮选剂最佳用量。研究结果表明:105#煤样亲水性显著,亲水性指数为0.16,且 < 0.03 mm高灰细泥占比达43.70%,可浮性等级为较难浮;捕收指数排序为生物捕收剂(0.85) > 十六烷(0.81) > 十二烷(0.77) > 煤油(0.76),生物捕收剂捕收能力最优;两段浮选工艺可满足现场指标,当生物浮选剂最佳用量为0.25 kg/t时,精煤灰分为12.63%、尾矿灰分为63.67%;与现场药剂对比,药剂耗量相当时,生物浮选剂精煤产率高6.76个百分点、尾矿灰分高13.33个百分点;精煤产率约45%相当时,生物浮选剂耗量节省6.4%;相同耗量0.3 kg/t下,生物浮选剂尾矿灰分提高10.3个百分点。生物浮选剂不仅解决了传统药剂的安全环保问题,还能通过优化两段浮选工艺,在降低药剂消耗的同时提升难浮煤分选效率与尾煤品质,符合“双碳”政策下煤炭清洁加工的发展需求。

       

      Abstract: To address the challenges of efficient refractory coal separation under the “Dual Carbon” policy and the safety and environmental shortcomings of traditional flotation reagents (kerosene and petrochemical diesel), this study evaluates the suitability and separation performance of safe, eco-friendly, and biodegradable bio-flotation reagents for specific refractory coal. Taking the 105# refractory coal from the Zhengli Mine Coal Preparation Plant in Lanxian as the research object, the particle size distribution was first analyzed through fractional screening, with a focus on high-ash fine slime distribution. Flotation rate and step-wise release tests were used to evaluate flotability and identify suitable processes. Inverse Gas Chromatography (IGC) was employed to determine surface energy parameters, such as dispersive surface energy and acid-base surface energy, alongside the hydrophilicity index. Additionally, a collector index was introduced to compare the performance of the bio-collector against kerosene, dodecane, and hexadecane.A two-stage flotation process (“one roughing + one cleaning”) was then implemented, using clean coal yield, ash content, and tailing ash content as core indicators to optimize the dosage of the bio-flotation reagents (comprised of a bio-collector and bio-frother) and compare them with onsite reagents. The results indicate that the 105# coal sample is significantly hydrophilic (index: 0.16), with high-ash fine slime (< 0.03mm) accounting for 43.70%, classifying it as difficult-to-float. The collector index follows the sequence: bio-collector (0.85) > hexadecane (0.81) > dodecane (0.77) > kerosene (0.76), demonstrating the superior collecting ability of the bio-reagent. The two-stage process successfully meets onsite production requirements; at an optimal dosage of 0.25 kg/t, clean coal ash is 12.63% and tailing ash is 63.67%. Compared to onsite reagents at equivalent dosages, the bio-reagent increases clean coal yield by 6.76 percentage points and tailing ash by 13.33 percentage points. At a constant yield of approximately 45%, bio-reagent consumption is reduced by 6.4%. At the same dosage of 0.3 kg/t, the bio-flotation agent increased the tailings ash content by 10.3 percentage points.Bio-flotation reagents not only resolve the safety and environmental issues of traditional reagents but also improve separation efficiency and tailing quality while reducing chemical consumption, aligning with the strategic needs for clean coal processing under the “Dual Carbon” framework.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回